<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony Ericsson M600i versus Nokia E70</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ben.geek.nz/2007/05/sony-ericsson-m600i-versus-nokia-e70/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ben.geek.nz/2007/05/sony-ericsson-m600i-versus-nokia-e70/</link>
	<description>...consuming experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:23:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.ben.geek.nz/2007/05/sony-ericsson-m600i-versus-nokia-e70/comment-page-1/#comment-16589</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetophile.com/sony-ericsson-m600i-versus-nokia-e70/#comment-16589</guid>
		<description>Wow Mike.  Good find.  I was told by somone else that it was EDGE only, and now I look at the box and the specs it is definitely UMTS.  I guess I&#039;ll be keeping this phone for some time now :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Mike.  Good find.  I was told by somone else that it was EDGE only, and now I look at the box and the specs it is definitely UMTS.  I guess I&#8217;ll be keeping this phone for some time now <img src='http://www.ben.geek.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.ben.geek.nz/2007/05/sony-ericsson-m600i-versus-nokia-e70/comment-page-1/#comment-16588</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetophile.com/sony-ericsson-m600i-versus-nokia-e70/#comment-16588</guid>
		<description>&quot;The M600i of course supports UMTS, whereas the E70 is EDGE only&quot; - this is untrue. The E70 of course supports 3G UMTS(maybe You don&#039;t have 3G range in your area. Please read &quot;technical specification&quot; on  Nokia site: http://europe.nokia.com/e70.  I have this phone and UMTS works beautifully according to specification 3GPP WCDMA Release 99.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The M600i of course supports UMTS, whereas the E70 is EDGE only&#8221; &#8211; this is untrue. The E70 of course supports 3G UMTS(maybe You don&#8217;t have 3G range in your area. Please read &#8220;technical specification&#8221; on  Nokia site: <a href="http://europe.nokia.com/e70" rel="nofollow">http://europe.nokia.com/e70</a>.  I have this phone and UMTS works beautifully according to specification 3GPP WCDMA Release 99.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jailyn Booth</title>
		<link>http://www.ben.geek.nz/2007/05/sony-ericsson-m600i-versus-nokia-e70/comment-page-1/#comment-16574</link>
		<dc:creator>Jailyn Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetophile.com/sony-ericsson-m600i-versus-nokia-e70/#comment-16574</guid>
		<description>This one makes sence &quot;One&#039;s first step in wisdom is to kuesstion everything - and one&#039;s last is to come to terms with everything.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one makes sence &#8220;One&#8217;s first step in wisdom is to kuesstion everything &#8211; and one&#8217;s last is to come to terms with everything.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebhelyesfarku</title>
		<link>http://www.ben.geek.nz/2007/05/sony-ericsson-m600i-versus-nokia-e70/comment-page-1/#comment-16550</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebhelyesfarku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 08:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetophile.com/sony-ericsson-m600i-versus-nokia-e70/#comment-16550</guid>
		<description>Too bad that Nokia has dropped the high resolution screens and uses 320x240px on 2&quot;-3&quot; screens  just like the most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad that Nokia has dropped the high resolution screens and uses 320&#215;240px on 2&#8243;-3&#8243; screens  just like the most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.ben.geek.nz/2007/05/sony-ericsson-m600i-versus-nokia-e70/comment-page-1/#comment-16074</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 22:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetophile.com/sony-ericsson-m600i-versus-nokia-e70/#comment-16074</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always found Nokia&#039;s strength is in their user experience so to be honest I&#039;m not surprised you favour the E70.

A couple of years ago I was developing on the P900 family and quite frankly was rather unimpressed with their user experience. Wonder if it&#039;s improved at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always found Nokia&#8217;s strength is in their user experience so to be honest I&#8217;m not surprised you favour the E70.</p>
<p>A couple of years ago I was developing on the P900 family and quite frankly was rather unimpressed with their user experience. Wonder if it&#8217;s improved at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
